Tuesday, April 19, 2005

Fight the Killer Flu, known as the NDP of Canada

It's time to take off all the gloves. Read how, in the recent posting by freaks inc., United for a Conservative Canada.

Wednesday, April 13, 2005

Freaks on Retreat. A Manifesto. Of sorts.

Where do we go from here?
It’s been a little under a month since our first Freak blog was published. Since then, we have grown to 12 blogs which are linked through our freaks inc. site. Now is the time to put our feet into the ocean for a few days to see where we go from here. So, as of tomorrow, April 14, there will be no postings until about April 19 as all the Freaks associated with all the sites go on retreat. We will be asking ourselves these questions, among others:
1. Do we continue as blogs or go to a full Web site? Or, both?
2. Will all the Freaks, from all the blogs, join in the upcoming election to lobby against all those politicians who support Bill C-17? Or, do we concentrate our efforts on the Liberals and the NDP and ignore the Bloc and the Conservatives? (If we go after the Bloc, we will have to recruit a French speaking Freak.) And, do we really want to go after the Conservatives? Truth be told, although we have picked on the Conservatives along with all the other parties, most of the Freaks are supportive of the Conservative Party. If this party wins the next election, we are sure they won’t be as anxious to support the spread of non-medical drugs, as are the other political parties. Or, do we remain completely apolitical?
3. How much money do we pour into the upcoming election campaign? Do we try to raise some cash? How many Freaks will put their lives on hold to fight this campaign?
4. How do we fight the campaign? Do we use news releases and telephone interviews with media that are situated within the targeted ridings, as well as updates to our blogs or web page (the latter depends on the time we have before an election to get a Web page up) or do we also use billboards and other mass advertising? This, of course, depends on our finances and would probably necessitate some fund raising. Are there any rich Freaks (or not Freaks) out there, who support our fight against the spread of non-medical drugs, such as pot?
5. Will we finally have an Executive Director to co-ordinate all our FAD (Freaks Against Drugs) business? It is important to have a "front man" for all media contacts. We have two Freaks here who are capable and have the experience to do this, but they are a bit leery of becoming front men because of some of the language, in the past, used on many of our sites. Not only what we have said, but how we have said it is bothersome to both of them. Each site is independent of the other and even within sites, particularly the FAD site, there is more than one person posting. If we are to be taken more seriously, our candidates for Executive Director have said that all postings (at least on the FAD sites) would have to be cleared by them. Some of our more anarchist Freaks have a problem with this.
6. Do we disband? Say, "it was nice to get our feelings out but, there is more to life..." and just let the country go to pot?
7. That’s about it. If you have feedback, please email us at freaksinc2@hotmail.com.
8. Until next week, this is Peter wishing you peace. Freak peace

Monday, April 11, 2005

NDP gets F- is our Drug Report Card.

The NDP picked up the worse mark of any of our country's political parties. They even did worse than the Bloc. See this link for the reason behind the NDP's poor showing.

A Canada led by the New Democratic Party.

If the NDP has their way, the picture below demonstrates what we can expect to see more of, not only in our cities but in rural towns and villages. Young people dead. With a syringe lying above their cold, lifeless bodies.

Thursday, April 07, 2005

This Picture is Not Cute. But it's True.

Please, don't click on this link one hour before a meal. Or, until at least an hour after your meal. It's not a pretty sight. But it's something we will see more of if Jack Layton and the NDP press ahead with softening Canada's drug laws.

Tuesday, April 05, 2005

Where the other parties stand on this issue?

Check out the Liberals at this link. The Conservatives are here, looking over their shoulder. And the Bloc can be found here sipping wine.

The Lemmings March On.

Say what you like about the NDP. But, one thing you can count on, is that they either are quick to leave their conscience at the door or else they actually do vote with one voice. Even, when they don't support their party's stand. While we have heard that one or two have some questions with Bill C-17, the bill to start the process to legalized pot, their vote on this bill during the first reading on November 2, 2004, doesn't show this. All 19 NDP members stood up, took the joint out of their mouth, and without exhaling, voted yes to the bill. No one was absent - the only party with everyone there - and not one voted no.

Congratulations to the NDP!

While this party deserves our condemnation for how they are pushing the drugging of Canadians (see our next posting on this), they do deserve an A+ for making their views known. One of the first to respond to our survey was the MP critic on the issue of Bill C-17, Libby Davies (Vancouver East). She was kind in her response (more so than any other MP) and attached a five-page document laying out the NDP stand on Bill C-17, the bill that is the first step to legal pot. Makes you almost want to support her. Just kidding. One other NDP member also responded to our survey.